by Chris Black

Nobody should own multiple homes, right Bern??

By the way in which, how’s Bernie feel about usury and all of the Rothschild owned central banks all over the world?

Even functionally, it doesn’t make sense.

What do you do with Jeff Bezos’ stock that makes him that wealthy? Take the shares away so he loses control of the corporate that he built?

Not that I’m a fan of Bezos, but that is idiotic on its face.

Those that hold public office ought to be disallowed from trading throughout the time they’re in office and for a variety of years after; furthermore their total wealth ought to be subject to an independent audit for a variety of years after they leave.

Term limits is one other big issue, i.e. you shouldn’t be allowed to make a profession in politics.

Corporate control over mass media is one other issue, i.e. you can not allow for-profit corporations to dictate public opinion in a so-called democracy. Unlike some retards imagine, politics is downstream from culture (read mass media).

Fractional banking is one other big issue, i.e. you can not allow private for-profit entities to take control over a rustic’s money supply, because they’ll find yourself owning the whole lot (which they did).

Money just isn’t free speech, this can be a HUGE issue (no more PACs, super PACs etc.) Money mustn’t be allowed in politics, period. Within the US, bribing politicians is completely legal.

Universal suffrage is a HUGE issue in a democratic country, i.e. not all people ought to be allowed to vote as they don’t have an equal stake in the long run of the country.

I don’t know what the answer could be, but this country is simply too far gone to save lots of at this point.