That is an excerpt from Dollar Scholar, the Money newsletter where news editor Julia Glum teaches you the fashionable money lessons you NEED to know. Don’t miss the subsequent issue! Join at money.com/subscribe and join our community of 160,000+ Scholars.
I wrote a story in May about how 56% of respondents to a recent survey say they think the USA is experiencing a recession — when in point of fact, the economy is doing just nice. There’s numerous reasons for the disconnect (politics is an enormous one), but at the center of the difficulty is the undeniable fact that on a regular basis Americans are still feeling crushed by the price of living.
The cost of dining out, as an illustration, is up 4% from a yr ago. Mortgage rates are high; in lots of places, rent increases have outpaced wages. And don’t even get me began on auto and residential insurance.
Every dollar counts as of late, and meaning it’s extra-important to grasp the quiet forces shaping my spending habits.
What common marketing tactics should I look out for while shopping?
Tong Guo, a marketing professor at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business, tells me that there are “numerous psychological biases that get exploited by marketers.”
A classic one is left-digit bias, which is our tendency to focus more on the leftmost number in a price than ones further to the proper. Even though it’s really only a single-cent difference, consumers perceive $4.99 to be significantly cheaper than $5, which is an underestimation that “hugely increases purchase likelihood,” Guo says.
Because more purchases = more profit for the corporate, this strategy is super popular. Based on a 2022 academic paper that analyzed 1000’s of grocery products, a whopping 87% of costs end with 9.
The truth is, the phenomenon runs so deep that it influences stock prices and the design of price tags.
“They use a smaller font for .99,” Guo adds. “Even from the framing of that price tag, they struggle to use the bias to show your attention to the left part as a substitute of the proper a part of the digit.”
One other way marketers nudge shoppers to spend more is by manufacturing scarcity. For example, a Publix promotion may dictate you could only buy 4 of an on-sale item when in point of fact it’s well-stocked. By telling shoppers there’s a limit, the retailer is making the time seem rare — and pushing you to make the most ASAP.
“People think, ‘OK it’s going to expire,’ but additionally ‘[other] persons are buying it since it’s good, so I even have to purchase it also,’” says Julio Sevilla, a marketing professor on the University of Georgia.
Probably the most famous examples of synthetic scarcity was masterminded by De Beers, a diamond company. For a lot of the twentieth century, De Beers all but had a monopoly on the diamond market, first restricting supply (by stockpiling them) after which rolling out an promoting strategy that drove up demand (by making diamond engagement rings a rite of passage for young lovers). Diamonds are still seen as precious and rare today.
More recently, we’ve seen this occur with special-edition Beanie Babies and Stanley cups. It doesn’t just apply to perceived scarcity of the product, either. An identical effect takes place when there’s a scarcity of time, like a promotion that only runs for a couple of days.
“[Having] a limited time to purchase often tends to cause us to need to buy more — and be willing to pay more,” says Charles Lindsey, a marketing professor on the University at Buffalo.
Price comparison is one other big theme here. Sevilla points to firms like Johnson & Johnson, which is thought for selling products in a bundle (like Johnson’s First Touch Baby Gift Set, a package containing bath wash, shampoo, lotion and diaper rash cream).
“As soon as you bundle something, you create a set, people think they’re getting a deal,” he says, regardless of the particular math.
It’s all in how our brains work: We wish to feel like we’re outsmarting the retailer, like we’ve found a secret technique to rating a great price.
On that note, Lindsey says the order wherein we encounter different prices may govern how we reply to them.
Say I’m taking a look at flights on Southwest’s website. The airline lists fares from most costly to least expensive, starting with Business Select and ending with Wanna Get Away. Because we are likely to read from left to right, meaning consumers start by taking a look at the most costly option and end with the most affordable. By the point I finally reach that Wanna Get Away fare on the far right, it looks like an incredible deal.
And truthfully, Southwest might be hoping that I don’t reach that base fare in any respect. It wants me to stop in the center and choose an Anytime fare since it appears to be a reduction. Even when only one% of shoppers fall for it, that’s a multi-million-dollar-win for Southwest, Lindsey says.
“We do not make evaluations in a fishbowl,” he adds. “We use context.”
The underside line
Retailers are sensible at using psychological tricks to affect my behavior. A lot of the preferred marketing techniques revolve around nudging me to spend by making me think an item is special or cheaper than usual.
Guo says that while it’s not possible to completely avoid them, awareness that these marketing tactics exist helps. Now that I learn about these tricks, I can recognize them while shopping — and possibly mitigate their influence.
More from Money:
Why Are Store Return Policies Suddenly Getting Worse?
What Common Items Should I Never Buy?
Is It Dangerous to Give My Phone Number to Stores and Restaurants?