Every time now we have to deal with the problem of “progressive” ideology in America today, the controversy inevitably finds its way around to the grand idealism of “acceptance” and “tolerance.” The assertion by leftists is that they’re on the side of “freedom” and human rights, and that by confronting or separating ourselves from certain behaviors we’re revealing out bigotry and discrimination. In other words, leftists assert that each one personal beliefs and behaviors should be embraced by the populace to ensure that society to turn out to be pure.
Except, this isn’t what they really consider. Leftists argue for tolerance of aberrant behaviors while admonishing normal human tribal and biological reactions. They’ve a vision for the world, and certain beliefs aren’t accepted inside that Utopian fantasy.
The idea of the leftist religion isn’t a deity, it’s self perception. They worship themselves and think the collective is helpful as long as it reaffirms their identity. Anything that may restrict their pursuit of self aggrandizement is taken into account oppressive. Because of this they often argue in favor of ethical relativism. They’ve a delusion of their mind of what they’re; they see themselves as a incredible gift to the world. But, if individuals are allowed to guage them on their moral failings then they are going to at all times be reminded that they aren’t all that spectacular. So, they seek to regulate the views and speech of others.
While they speak continuously of acceptance, they depend on zealotry to attain their objectives. They’re highly intolerant of people that don’t want to take part in their movement or their activism. The truth is, one of the crucial used protest slogans of the political left is “silence is violence.” By refusing to support them, or by keeping to yourself, you robotically turn out to be their enemy even should you don’t directly oppose them.
At bottom what leftists really promote is a series of double standards while using accusations of bigotry as a weapon to silence their critics. They’ve taken control of the narrative because many Americans are afraid to say the reality out loud. The reality is, tolerance is overrated and destructive. Gatekeeping and discrimination, to a certain degree, are absolutely essential to the survival of humanity.
That’s to say, intolerance of certain people, beliefs, actions and ideologies is a very good thing. We’d like to bring back rational intolerance.
There are people inside the liberty movement and conservative circles that hold more libertarian views on this issue and a few of them might suggest that my position runs contrary to the concept of the non-aggression principle. They could say that so long as people aren’t harming us directly then we must always stay out of their way. I say there may be a positive line between tolerance and submissive pacifism.
Obviously the globalist establishment and their puppets inside the political left are counting on provocateur tactics to a certain degree. One might suggest that they WANT us to lash out violently so that they can demonize us further, or they need us to embrace government power more fully so that they can paint us as authoritarian. It is a simplistic grade-school view of provocateur methods, though. In point of fact, the goal of provocateurs isn’t to get us to react, their goal is to frighten us into DOING NOTHING.
Have a look at the circus surrounding January 6th, for instance. The establishment turned a protest of unarmed individuals who walked right into a constructing after which left of their very own accord into an “rebel.” Did some people get violent? After all, though not a single person died due to actions of protesters. Was there property damage? Nothing in comparison with the billions in damages brought on by the BLM and Antifa riots. But conservative protesters are being labeled enemies of the state and are being locked up right away while BLM is labeled “mostly peaceful.”
The double standard is evident, but the rationale for it is usually misunderstood. They don’t want liberty movement organization. They don’t want planned actions. They don’t want open marches by conservatives. They don’t want the world to see our numbers. They wants us silent and complacent and uninvolved. Upsetting a response isn’t the tip game. The double standard isn’t the tip game. The tip game is for conservatives to offer up because they fear the double standard.
Every strategy of the left circles back around to pacification of the population, whether or not they are accusing us of racism or transphobia or fascism or rebel. None of this matters. The moment we abandon the fallacies of tolerance and block destructive efforts is the moment we turn out to be truly free and effective. There are particular situations by which the non-aggression principle doesn’t apply.
Currently, the US is experiencing full blown 4th Generation warfare. Within the span of lower than a decade now we have seen the imposition of Critical Race Theory, trans ideology, Marxism and a spectrum of progressive concepts invade public schools. American children are being indoctrinated into the leftist fold in a dizzying propaganda blitzkrieg.
Now, the libertarian mindset would suggest that we simply pull our youngsters out of public schools and take away our participation. That may work for some people, however the overwhelming majority of oldsters are going to proceed placing their kids in schools because they feel they haven’t any other selection. We don’t have the time needed to create latest educational systems and alternatives. School vouchers are a start, but even then it might take well over a decade for fogeys to regulate. The one answer is to shut down the indoctrination, by force if mandatory.
Leftist teachers that promote their ideology in school must be faraway from publicly funded schools. CRT, gender fluid propaganda, and one sided socialist concepts can have to be banned from these institutions. Drag shows for teenagers must be punished. Gender affirmation surgeries and chemical therapies for youngsters must be abolished. The invasion of woke disinformation into our media must be confronted and firms that advertise must be buried through boycotts.
Tolerance is killing us. Intolerance is the reply. While certain ideological movements may not goal you personally, they are going to eventually destroy every part you like through attrition. And it’s never going to stop, because moral relativism is at all times finding latest ground to desecrate.
You won’t be allowed to have principles. You won’t be allowed to call out bad behaviors. All the things evil will likely be made acceptable. Should you really need to know where we’re headed as a civilization, try this trend being protected by courts in Pennsylvania – Satanic clubs for elementary school children at public schools. A few of these clubs are already energetic.
The primary inclination of those of us that defend constitutional values can be to cite religious freedom. After all, satanic and luciferian groups consistently argue that they’re NOT a faith, per se. Moderately they claim they’re an ideological system. The rationale the “After School Devil Club” uses the satanic moniker is since it is by definition religiously related. An ideological club isn’t necessarily protected by US courts. A spiritual club is protected. But should this apply to each religious club?
In a way, it is smart that this may be the natural evolution of leftist conquest. Eventually they’ll need some kind of spiritual framework to fill the void that politics leaves behind. And what higher “religion” than one which is founded in the idea of subjective morality and self obsession?
On this specific instance, I don’t accept that a cult built around promoting narcissism, moral relativism and transhumanism must be allowed around children. I believe that communities should gather up their torches and pitchforks and run these people out of town, but that’s just me.
Is that this intolerant? Intolerance of behavior rooted in deconstruction is totally mandatory. Whether you’re a spiritual person or agnostic or atheist, it’s undeniable that some methodologies encompass absolutely the worst in humanity and shouldn’t be embraced. The narrative of tolerance is leading us down a path to quiet compliance and consent.
The political left and the globalist establishment wish to play games with our principles. It’s the old Alinsky tactic of holding your opponents to their very own list of standards when you operate with no standards. That’s to say, they use our love of freedom against us and suggest we must allow them to do what they need or we aren’t living as much as the principles we value.
Nevertheless, it’s not authoritarian to guard the subsequent generation from indoctrination and it’s not hypocrisy to discriminate against the dark side. If that makes me a bigot, so be it. I’d quite live in a civilization of reasonable bigots than watch the world burn within the name of silly “equity.”