By Brandon Smith

Previously I actually have often tried to take a giant picture approach to the problems facing the American public and the way there is nearly at all times a deeper connection between a wide range of political and economic events. And, what has grow to be increasingly clear to me is that with a view to understand government actions and geopolitics, you should at all times ask yourself “Who advantages?”

The underside line is that this – At the center of nearly every conflict and each crisis the identical group of power mongers normally advantages, they usually have taken a keen interest within the climate change narrative specifically. But like I said, that is the massive picture. At once I’d like to try a comparatively small issue and the way the little dominoes lead as much as a much bigger con game and a much bigger disaster. Let’s speak about gas stoves…

Frankly, I don’t care about what my stove uses to cook with so long as it really works. That said, around 38% of US households use natural gas for cooking and heating. That’s a major percentage of those who depend on gas based energy for his or her every day needs. Here’s the issue, though – Natural gas will not be politically correct lately. Nearly all carbon emitting energy sources have been marked by climate activists and western governments as a threat that should be erased between 2030 to 2050.

Globalist institutions and climate change grifters have put natural gas on the naughty list, but there are a few realities that should be addressed. First, as noted, an unlimited portion of the western world including the US and Europe depend on natural gas for varied energy applications. Ban natural gas and civilization faces a direct plunge in economic activity, in addition to much higher prices on all remaining energy sources resulting from increasing demand. There may be NO green energy solution that may fill the identical roll as gas.

All you may have to do is have a look at Europe and the UK today and see how they’re scuffling with vastly higher costs resulting from sanctions on Russian gas exports. It’s a multitude, they usually are lucky that the winter has to this point been slightly mild, since the moment things freeze, they’re in trouble. There usually are not enough alternative energy resources available to meet Europe’s shortages if the temperatures plummet.

But what does this should do with banning gas stoves within the US? Isn’t that a health issue slightly than an environmental issue? No, it’s not a health issue, it’s a climate agenda issue being rebranded as a health issue.

There was a coordinated government and media blitz on the gas stove narrative this week, with an avalanche of claims that natural gas causes the whole lot from asthma in children to a slowdown in cognitive development. What’s the evidence for these claims? The Biden Administration and the agency weighing a possible ban, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), haven’t given specific sources yet.

The assertions are most probably rooted in a single study published in December by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health in December. The group is privately funded and this particular study on gas stoves was led by RMI, a non-profit research entity that advocates for aggressive green policies and works to “transform global energy systems across the actual economy.” The 2 lead authors, Talor Gruenwald and Brady Seals, are RMI researchers who’ve contributed to the group’s “carbon-free buildings” initiative.

In other words, the study is written by individuals with a inbuilt bias, and since science lately is now being linked to activism, no single study funded by a personal ideological group might be trusted. RMI will not be only a part of the climate cult, in addition they promote “equity” theory and general woke politics. These concepts and real science cannot coexist.

The American Gas Association made this exact point in a responding statement, noting that the study’s testing didn’t include real life appliance usage, and:

“Ignored [previous] literature, including one study of information collected from greater than 500,000 children in 47 countries that ‘detected no evidence’ of an association between the usage of gas as a cooking fuel and either asthma symptoms or asthma diagnosis.”

The push for a gas stove ban will not be about health, it’s about control. It’s an try and falsely link carbon emissions and energy products to negative health concerns as a approach to trick the general public into supporting decarbonization out of fear. But why revert to such a method? Is the climate cult really that desperate?

Yes, yes they’re.

You see, the reality about climate change is starting to spread to the masses, and the debunking of anti-carbon propaganda is picking up momentum. Listed below are the facts:

The typical global temperature will not be climbing to dangerous levels. The Earth’s temps have increased in accordance with the NOAA by lower than 1°C previously century.

There is no such thing as a evidence that this type of temperature increase represents a threat to the environment or human health. In actual fact, the Earth’s temps have been much higher than they’re today multiple times within the Earth’s history long before man-made carbon emissions were a thing. The official temperature record utilized by climate scientists only goes back to the Eighties – That may be a TINY sliver of time compared to the epic lifespan of the Earth’s atmosphere.

And what about all those arguments that there are more dangerous weather patterns emerging resulting from global warming? That’s a lie. There is no such thing as a significant difference between storm patterns today in comparison with 100 years ago.

And let’s not forget that global warming propaganda has been happening a protracted time now. Back after I was a child within the Eighties, they used to inform us in class that giant parts of continents can be under water by the yr 2000. This obviously never happened and certain never will. Lots of us who grew up in that era are still waiting around for the icecaps to melt.

The climate change agenda is about giving governments and globalist institutions the ability to bottleneck energy usage, tax carbon emissions and thus control almost every aspect of our every day lives. Without the free flow of carbon based energy just about all industry will collapse. Green energy is inefficient and can’t fill the void left behind by gas, petroleum and coal. All that will be left is a minimal manufacturing base, minimal food production and a shrinking human population. Those who survive can be slaves to carbon restrictions; it will be a living nightmare.

There are very wealthy and powerful people on the market that greatly profit from such a scenario.

The globalists have been scheming to make use of environmentalism as an excuse for centralization since not less than 1972, when the Club Of Rome, a think-tank attached to the UN, published a treatise titled ‘The Limits To Growth’. Twenty years later they’d publish a book titled ‘The First Global Revolution.’ In that document they specifically recommend using global warming as a vehicle:

“In trying to find a typical enemy against whom we will unite, we got here up with the concept that pollution, the threat of world warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. Of their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a typical threat which should be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers because the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have now already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are attributable to human intervention in natural processes, and it is simply through modified attitudes and behavior that they might be overcome. The true enemy then is humanity itself.”

The statement comes from Chapter 5 – The Vacuum, which covers their desire for global government. The quote is comparatively clear; a typical enemy should be conjured with a view to trick humanity into uniting under a single banner – The globalist banner. And the elites see environmental catastrophe, attributable to mankind itself, as the perfect possible motivator.

How does this agenda start? It starts with gas stoves. It starts with something we would see as small, after which it grows from there. Pretty soon, they will probably be banning natural gas for heating. They are going to ban wood stoves. They are going to artificially induce gas price inflation. Then they’ll implement carbon taxation on manufacturers which is able to in turn cause prices to rise for consumers. Then there will probably be carbon taxes for the common individual. They are going to use whatever means at their disposal to make it not possible to make use of “fossil fuels.”

Again, it’s not about health, it’s about control. It’s at all times about control. The gas stove issue is a fraud; one domino in a protracted chain that results in carbon totalitarianism.